As Elliott, Jason Behr must carry the film, a difficult task as he
spends almost the entire movie in a (rather large) cell, with nothing to do
besides wait for the next act of violence to befall him. It is an impressive performance. His character is flawed but sympathetic, and
his visible deterioration throughout the experience is realistically difficult
to watch.
Presumably, the audience knows what the five senses are, so we know
what is going to happen to Elliott.
Thanks to the movie poster and DVD cover, we also know the method used
for eliminating his last sense. This is
disappointing because, aside from the torture, there is not a whole lot going
on in Senseless. It is never
really clear what exactly Elliott’s captors stand for. It seems that they chose Elliott as their
victim because he’s a capitalist American businessman, but the group is only
too happy to capitalize on his suffering by using him to raise money for their
operations (exactly what these are is never explained).
I get that it’s a commentary on reality TV culture and desensitization,
but the fact that the torture is being streamed on the Internet is
preposterous. I don’t mean that it’s
unbelievable that people would watch it (sadly, I’m sure they would), but his
imprisonment lasts for more than a month, with newspaper articles and
campaigners calling for his release.
Surely someone would be able to trace where the Internet transmissions
were coming from and step in to save him.
Director Simon Hynd makes some interesting choices, but doesn’t fully
commit to them. When Elliott is stripped
of his hearing, Hynd alternates between entirely silent passages, sequences where
the sound is muffled, and scenes where… the sound is completely normal. It would have been much more effective if the
sound design had remained consistent.
Ultimately, Senseless has an interesting premise, but the movie is too
flawed to really recommend.
No comments:
Post a Comment